Now let\u2019s talk a little about the footnote in the new part of the \u201cwalking\u201d. Why is she so important? To do this, first look at the original text.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\u16a6\u16a2\u16be \u16bc\u16b1\u16ac\u16d2\u16c5\u16a6\u16c5 \u16c1\u16b4<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The last two words clearly read as hr\u00f3pa\u00f0a ek<\/em> - \u201cI shouted\/exclaimed.\u201d There are difficulties with the first one. The fact is that the younger fufark is a writing system that is very... ambiguous, to put it mildly. For example, she does not distinguish between single and double letters, so at first the translators generally decided that the word \u16a6\u16a2\u16be (jun<\/em>) - This \u00feunn<\/em>, "thin". It is clear that this made little sense.<\/p>\n\n\n\n After this, as you remember, all the manuscripts were taken for examination and returned with notes. And they, together with the words of Acherus, add up to the following picture.<\/p>\n\n\n\n